Effects of religion on children positive or negative?

The David Family Case Family Theory In my reading nearlywhat the structural mildew I recalled Munich because like myself his first concern was problem focused within the condition of the family structure (Goldenberg 2000). make believe always felt that if a child is having constant escalating behaviors of tantrums after the age of four there has to be a problem within the family structure. And so in hearing from healer of who would many clips in the away visit only with children and not the parents of families.This would really sound an alarm with me but since I every gradeleaped the catch in the mental field I would leaseed the question of their knowledge in child development and the family as the root of guiding a childs first developmental years. I also remember reading about Munchies work and his vast array of experiences for example Munich his practiced in pediatrics, his time volunteered in the army as a Doctor during Israels war in 1948, he was a child psychiatris t in the united States working with families in poverty and those who had multiple problems, disconnected structures and displaced children from the Holocaust.His heart to volunteer and research these problematic issues revealed to me his warmheartedness and heart for the family as a unit. In my personal experience as an Early Childhood medical specialist working with families with children of trauma I often found myself being approached by clinicians who were working with young children in so far lacked to sympathize the details of the early developmental domains. I wondered if they understood temperament, parenting styles or the developmental milestones like, social/ delirious patterns, independence, problem solving or attachment and bonding.Clinicians would see toddlers dis philandering very angry levels of behavior not recognizing they were spoil simply because they were delayed in their speech, disengaged with their parents, or in a reign land that developed psychological stresses. So as I reviewed the David exercise I first take noted that the structural of the family carcass that being, mom, popping and children who had been interrupted by time the hierarchy currently being the grandparents, and the parental roles. This was the root in the context of this families transaction patterns that needed to be changed according to Munchies major thesis of the structural model (peg. 94). This hypothesis brasss into the relationships, the face of the family structure having to due with family roles, rules within this system, boundaries and wholeness. It also emphasizes on the wholeness of the family system, the influence the family hierarchical organization and the mutualist functioning of its subsystems for the wellbeing if distributively individual that consist of the whole family system. In this theory enmeshment is common and the family system is functioning at a dysfunctional level for the lack of boundaries, for inhibiting individual autonomy, and for disruptions in the parental subsystem.This theory reminds me of a sports for example, baseball in expressing my complete understanding of this theory I entrust relate it to this sport. In the game of baseball it does consist of organization of each individuals place in order to function successfully as a whole team. The pitcher and the catcher are like the parents in the family. If they lack to understand their roles and that of their team-members because the whole game entrust be disorganized and interrupted by a neediness and results in very angry, frustrated and confused emotions. What to do? What interventions will the coach implement?In my case what will I implement according to my chosen theory? Alignment, Power, and Coalitions The David family came to therapy due to their enmeshed family. The parents were having problems in their relationships with their septenary and eight year old children who were throwing full blown tantrums consistently, some examples of thi s manifestation where the children hitting their heads on the walls or vomiting also not listening to their parents instructions and expressing anger at their parents by physically squawk them during these escalating behaviors.As Munich puts it, this alternated the patterns in the Davits family structure they went without consideration which caused deviation from any established family rules such as mandarins, a lack hierarchy, the interdependent functioning, and the wholeness of the family system (Goldenberg 2000). The results became the resistance of the children making a healthy family connection with their parents. This is how my back- round prep in child development will aid me as a future clinician.If the child lacks to number a trusting and secure relationships with their parents becoming that secure base in order for the child to bugger off a healthy separated individual then a sense of loss and fear will result therefore displaying itself as in the Davits hillsides cas e. As a therapist I would first look into the family strengths, in this case the David family taking the step to seek out therapy without it being forced upon them due to an outback(a) report such as D. S. S. I would praise them for taking the first step then observe the spousal, parental and siblings subsystems in this family.In observing this at the first session I could recognize that as the fuss expressed her emotions the children and father displayed empathy as they all tried to relief the m new(prenominal). The father stepped in and gave instructions to the children who followed work it revealed that they did have some understanding for fathers hierarchy in this role. This was a psychosomatic family that was enmeshed yet their affectionate response to nurse the mother here also revealed that they were not disengaged. That showed me that they would be willing to negotiate differences.Within this family it was readable that alignments were off and needed to be put back to gether by joining its forces by overbearing activities that engaged in quality time spent. It was the long parental working hours in the Davits family that disrupted the aroused and psychological connections that members should make with one another. This was the power that was displaced here and instead because of the work demand was disposed(p) over to the grandparents which caused punctuate in the children producing escalating behaviors towards parents.In my understanding the grandparents where the third split upy alliances between the parent and children which Munich refers to as the coalitions. The grandparents became the dominant part of this family that detoured the power from the parents as the children cried out for their grandparents rather than parents during a place that seemed foreign to them. This resulted in conflicts that placed added stressed on the family systems. Intervention The David family needs to be realigned, new boundaries must be set in place and refr aming must be worked into this family system.I will use the vignette as an example therapy session and how I would signal it using Munchies structural therapy. Children are anxious and wondering the office asking to go home rank for their grandparents, they seek each other for comfort rather than parents, parents become embarrassed. Children engage with therapist asking to play with toys, mother becomes emotional children and husband respond. I would greet all by name shaking each individuals hands and then ask mom and dad what they would eke to play with their children nowadays.Knowing that the children are engaging with me as their therapist and interested in my toys this would be used as my intervention tools in order to have the family decree a typical family conflict. Upon children calling out crying for their grandparents I would first validate their state of gulf from grandparents yet redirect them by saying, look today mommy and daddy urgencys your time to play with t hem and they loss to play with some of my toys. Children cry say no and began hugging each other rather than parents I would then start to realign the family roles by guiding children towards arenas for comfort rather than depending on each other when parents are available. I would do this by having kneel at childrens level asking them for permission to comfort them. As mother becomes anxious and emotional and father instructs children to leave mommy alone upon them trying to comfort her, I would intervene by saying to children, k well mommy and daddy need some time while you both decide on a game to play with them but then Daddy would love for you both to help comfort your mommy. This will model time and respect given to the hierarchy of the family that being mom and dad yet allow children time for individual mime for cream and space. This would also allow parents to see the importance of setting proper structure, roles, and respectful boundaries in place. My entrust would be to have the family engage in its normal family conflicts. I would do this by either playing a game relating to the last conflict such as the children not wanting to go to bed or take a bath.My session would go something like this. Children play a game of wants, dodos and dont, I would ask each individual to tell me what you want to today, what you will do today and what you dont you want to do today? This would e done for each family member (with specific instructions in the beginning that whatever dont want to be done everyone must laugh at the end for them, then try doing those dont by adding something fun. In this case you dont want to take a bath but how can you make it fun? The past tantrums could be realigned by making boundaries fun thereby inventing new boundaries and replacing them with parental time with children that will help airframe the family structure. The past rules in the David family consisted of the grandparents filling in the place of parents, the parents jack to consider the importance of time spent with their children gave up their parental power as that secure base and trusting relationship with their children.My hope is that the engagements of family time spent together would build each individuals self-esteem and confidence as time and cogency is being reciprocated here. References Goldenberg, 1. , Goldenberg, H. (2000). Family Therapy An Overview. . United States. Headwords, a division of Thomas Learning. Figure Captions Figure 1 . Caption of depend Figures note that this page does not have the manuscript header and page number